![]() ![]() The panel held that one-to-one communications can satisfy the “notice” requirement in § 2251(d)(1), and that a rational fact-finder could find that the defendant made a notice offering child pornography when she sent a one-toone electronic message linking to a Dropbox account that contained child pornography. COX SUMMARY ** Criminal Law The panel affirmed convictions on child pornographyrelated charges, including one count of making a notice offering child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. Gwin, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. Opinion by Judge Gwin * The Honorable James S. Silver, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted San Francisco, California Filed JBefore: Ryan D. ![]() ![]() 3:16-cr-08202ROS-1 OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Roslyn O. SARAH MELISA COX, AKA Sarah Cox, AKA Sarah Cunningham, Defendant-Appellant. FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |